Being a Boy: Sexual Abuse Often Taboo For Black Boys

I stumbled upon an interesting topical discussion on NPR about the sexual abuse of black boys. The discussion was only thirteen minutes long, so it was limited in terms of what could be discussed.

What I found most interesting was Dr. Carl Bell’s acknowledgment that there is a double standard in how people react to hearing about sexual violence against boys versus acts against girl because many people contend that the double standard is fair, or in the case of feminists, non-existent.

When I noted the difference in how differently people would respond to someone joking about female victimization, feminist blogger Cara not only claimed that this was not true, but considered it an attack on female victims to even suggest that no one would tolerate that kind of joke against women. From a feminist perspective, sexual violence against males, especially when committed by women, is little more than an extension of male privilege and society’s endorsement of it is, as Cara phrases it, paternalism — regardless that feminists represent the most vocal group that renders sexual violence against boys and men invisible and treats it as something other than rape.

Like Cara, those feminists disregard the notion that any of the women and girls who rape boys are individually or collectively responsible for their actions, nor do they acknowledge that women benefit from the privilege of having their sexuality viewed as so harmless as to be more helpful than traumatizing when they force themselves sexually on others. Instead, the blame is placed on males, on male privilege and paternalism, and on the victimized boys and men by virtue of their gender and their inherent complicity in the “patriarchy.” This coincidentally, meets Cara’s definition for “rape apologism,” one in which she and the other feminists on the thread completely ignore the responsibility women have to prevent the female predation on boys and men. Their solution to addressing female sexual violence against males is to alter society’s perception of masculinity, not discuss what leads women and girls to rape males or address society’s (and feminists’) perception of female sexuality as harmless.

Unfortunately, this dodge is repeated in the interview, though not with the same implied denial of female responsibility that occurred in Cara’s post. Instead, the commentors focus on how masculinity works to silence males victims, which is in and of itself a valid issue, especially within the black community where masculinity and femininity exist as even more exaggerated caricatures than the rest of society (perhaps with the exception of the Latino community). Given the shortness of the discussion, there was not enough time for anyone to question what leads to this level of hyper-genderfication, although it could be argued that the absence of fathers and positive male role models and black women’s antagonism towards black men may play a prominent role. Likewise, society’s view of black males as somehow less than men and less than human, and its requirement for black males as a group to prove themselves also may play a role. It also cannot be ignored that tendency for males without role models to group together and create their own, often far from helpful, role models may be a factor.

Society demands that males deal with everything on their own and to keep it to themselves. Seeking help is seen as a sign of weakness, not just by other men, but also by women. It is viewed as a male’s inability to handle a situation or problem, proof of his general inadequacy. This message is taught to boys at a very young age, and is very difficult to challenge, particularly when the “safe” places victimized men and boys could turn to often turn those males away. As a result, being vulnerable enough to ask for help puts males at risk socially, and it unfortunately puts them at risk to being abused again by someone, male or female, who detects their vulnerability and seeks to exploit it.

That said, the commentors missed the opportunity to discuss how society’s framing of female sexuality plays an equal role in maintaining the social taboo. Society’s current view is impacted not only by older views, but current feminist views, with both presenting women’s sexuality as inherently harmless.  It would have been good to hear a discussion about how female abusers mitigate their actions by presenting themselves as victims or by playing on stereotypes created and perpetuated by society and feminists alike.

This would have been particularly helpful because when Talib Darryl shared his experience, he added the caveat that his abuser may have been abused, which is a very common remark when people discuss female sexual abusers. The notion that females only abuse because it was done to them first (presumably by males) reduces their culpability for their actions, and unfortunately this is an idea that is purported by society and feminists. Another important point that could have been addressed is the presentation of the female body as something that ought to be desired. Again, both society and feminists perpetuate this framing and vilify those who reject that female advances are always acceptable and wanted and that male consent is implied by the male gender, with the former framing males who disagree as gay while feminist frame them as the same and/or misogynists.

While the discussion is not a bad one, the major point that was missed is exactly how this plays out in the black community, particularly given that this is a community that places women on a very odd pedestal. There was no discussion of how the gender dynamic in the community prevents boys from coming forward or how the black community relegates all victims, male and female, to silence in an effort to prevent airing dirty laundry. There was no discussion on the reaction black women have they are told black males are frequently victimized by women in the community and how this affects their perception of the issue. There was no discussion about how race relations between the community and the police effect the reporting of abuse, arrests, charges and trials. Again, there was a very limited amount of time for the discussion, yet hearing those things would have  given a much clearer picture of the specific reasons black boys and men do not come forward.

Nevertheless, the discussion is worth listening to and does bring to light some of the feelings and issues boys and men experience when they have been victimized and how they are treated by people at large and within their community.

8 thoughts on “Being a Boy: Sexual Abuse Often Taboo For Black Boys

  1. TS: Cara seems to be the kind of feminist who dutifully scans the horizon with binoculars, meticulously counting every female victim she sees, while standing atop a mountain of male corpses.

    Has it struck you yet, TS, that to be a feminist requires one to have a peculiar way of selecting, filtering and interpreting information? It is quite a simple process, really:

    1. When confronted with an atrocity, check the crotch of the victim.

    2. If crotch = penis, forget about it, goto 1.

    3. If crotch = vagina, goto 4.

    4. Check the crotch of the victimizer.

    5. If crotch = vagina, ignore the whole thing, goto 1.

    6. If crotch = penis, shout: “OMG MISOGYNY!!!!!!”

    The more image-conscious feminists might modify Step 2 by occasionally blaming Teh Patriarchy that all men are complicit in. Because they’re compassionate.

  2. Hmm, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a feminist claiming that “women are to be desired” by men. I’ve more often seen the (more or less) implicit assumption that male desire of women is in itself objectifying/degrading/threatening to the desired women, and therefore bad.

    Could you give examples where feminists make that claim?

  3. I would not say that Cara “stands atop a mountain of male corpses,” although I do agree with the general process you presented as that does seem to be quite often at play. What strikes me about the feminist response to male rape (an issue I do not think feminists are in any position to discuss anyway) is how they frame it as always being men’s fault even when the rapists are female. The unwillingness to simply confront sexual violence committed by women as something women do to males in an attempt to exert their will, power and desires on others — which is the key dynamic of rape — is astounding.

    Granted, feminists are used to attacking masculinity as the source of all social problems, so it is not necessarily a surprise that the problem Cara and feminists like her see is not that women rape boys and men, but that social expectations on males can impact their ability to cope with the abuse they suffered.

  4. I can offer no explicit statements, although I would argue that it is implied in the feminist position on the female body, particularly in the idea that all women ought to be considered beautiful. Obviously, that other women acknowledge that beauty is less important than men acknowledging average women (think the Doves ads) as just as beautiful if not more attractive than conventionally attractive women. So in that way feminists both rebuff male desire and also demand that it be spread equally across all women. I would also argue that it is implied in the feminist position on female sexuality and the notion that it is both harmless and that men who reject or rebuff the expression of that sexuality, regardless of the context of how it is presented, do so out of undo intimidate and fear of female power.

  5. Put this way, it looks quite a bit more like some feminist rhetoric I’ve seen. Thanks for clarifying.

  6. The Let Go…Let Peace Come In Foundation is a newly formed nonprofit with a mission to help heal and support adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse worldwide. We are actively seeking adult survivors who would be willing to post a childhood photo and caption, their story, or their creative expressions to our website http://www.letgoletpeacecomein.org. By uniting survivors from across the globe we can help provide a stronger and more powerful voice to those survivors who have not yet found the courage to speak out. Together we can; together we should; together we NEED to stand up and be counted. Please visit our site for more details on how you can send us your submissions.

    Thank you for everything you do!

    Gretchen Paules
    Administrative Director
    Let Go…Let Peace Come In Foundation
    111 Presidential Blvd., Suite 212
    Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004

  7. The “male gaze”?

    I’ve never understood the concept myself. It seems to be a claim that looking at women oppresses them.

    That might be very true, it just happens to go-against the feminist claim that women are just as tough and capable as men are, fully capable of becoming cops and soldiers and FBI agents and so on. If looking at a woman causes her to fall to bits, it doesn’t speak very highly of her strength.

    It is as if feminists say: “OF COURSE women are weak, pathetic creatures who cannot survive without massive government protection! But don’t you dare say as much when it’s time to consider a woman for a job!”

    I’ve never been able to hold the two thoughts in my head at the same time. My inadequate male brain, you know.

  8. This is off-topic to this particular thread. I agree that the “male gaze” thing is absolute bunk, but the point of this thread is about sexual violence against boys, not bad feminist theory.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s