Jason Aaron: God of Blunders

Back in September, Marvel decided to strip Thor of his hammer and give it to a currently unnamed female character. This is not the first time the God of Thunder was deemed unworthy of wielding Mjolnir. Beta Ray Bill, Thunderstrike, Throg, and even Wonder Woman have held the hammer for a period of time.

The difference this time is that not only was the hammer taken from Thor, but also his identity and name. Writer Jason Aaron stated in an interview that this new female replace is “not She-Thor or Lady Thor. She’s not Thorika. She is Thor. This is the new Thor.”

The problem is that Thor is not a mantle. It is not a title. It is the character’s given name.

To put this perspective, Spider-man is mantle. While one can argue that the mantle is defined by Peter Parker and that no one can truly replace him, it remains a title Parker applied to himself. In contrast, “Peter Parker” is his given name. No one can simply take his name and become “Peter Parker.”

However, this does not work with Thor since “Thor” is his given name. He is Thor Odinson, and simply swapping him out with a female character will not change that.

Yet what makes this particular situation so troubling is how Aaron handles the switch. Aaron does not simply deem Thor unworthy. He humiliates him. He turns Thor into a petulant child whining about his lost toy. He emasculates him. He allows the replacement to utterly defeat Thor in battle, with Thor admitting at the end he is not good enough.

He also panders to the left, turning the new “Thor” into a feminist sockpuppet and giving her enough straw men to beat up to pour salt in the wounds of fans angered by the change.

In Thor #5, Aaron has female Thor pummel Absorbing Man as the villain gives a straw man version of the arguments against the new replacement. Female Thor, obviously, has little problem fighting him, but she does so while monologuing about feminism. Yet she is not the one to dispatch him. Titania takes in out, and then promptly gives up to female Thor out of female solidarity.

When I saw the pages days ago, I assumed they were a feminist edit. However, they are not. These are the published pages:

ApugwJvzpS0AoTkDoMPOz

This is nothing more than trolling in comics. I would think someone of Aaron’s caliber would have the maturity not to spit in the faces of Thor fans. Instead, he panders to a group of people who regularly mock male rape victims and tweet hashtags like “kill all men.”

This does not maintain sales, let alone boost them. Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos noted that sales for the book have dropped, but that is not entirely true. Solicitations have dropped, yet even that can be deceptive. Many books start with high numbers and fall 40% to 60% within the first five issues as the books find their readership. A better insight into how well this anti-male pandering turns profits would be to look at past attempts. When one does this, it becomes rather disconcerting for Marvel. Their three most recent attempts — Captain Marvel, Ms Marvel, and X-men — have seen significant drops in solicits since their debut.

Captain Marvel debuted at 24,800 books in September 2012. It was relaunched in March 2014, and solicited 44,200 books. As of January 2015, it sits at 19,500 books. The all-female X-men debuted in May 2013 at 178,000 books. It now sits at 29,650 books. Ms Marvel debuted at 50,300 books. It now sits at 30,300 books. (Ultimate Spider-man met a similar fate, with numbers dropping fairly quickly despite all the progressives’ claims about supporting the character.)

Pandering to the feminist demographic does not move books. It does, however, insult the existing fan base, engage in pandering and misandry, and fuels more antagonism between fans and feminists.

What makes the situation so ridiculous is that Aaron’s arc is so obviously a politically correct stunt that it is comical for him or anyone else to treat it seriously. Hiding the character’s identity is a fine example of that. The moment the reader knows who is behind the mask, the character stops being female “Thor” and becomes *insert name* wielding Mjolnir.

Had Aaron simply done the latter — replaced the character without calling her “Thor” — it would still be blatant pandering to a group of people who whine about sexism and “bad” costumes even when they get what they want, but the fan base might have reacted with less antipathy. Aaron would not have taken away the character they love, only sidelined him for a bit.

Instead, Aaron set about rubbing fans’ faces in his decision from the start. That is a poor way to begin a story arc, and it has only gotten worse since then. This would be a fine ploy if readers had no option. Yet they do: they can stop reading the book.

It also builds negativity between readers and the writer. One can ask Dan Slott about the amount of hate mail he received over turning Doctor Octopus into Spider-man and then rubbing Peter Parker fans’ faces in it when they complained.

I do not read Aaron’s work, and I have never been a fan of Thor, so this is less a personal issue for me than one of practicality. The industry needs more readers. That does not mean feminist-leaning, man-hating, race-baiting, “social justice warriors.” That means younger readers. Younger readers, like my godson and his friends, take one look at Aaron’s antics and go back to their better written, better paced, far more interesting, and already diverse manga and anime.

So perhaps Aaron should stop attacking straw man arguments, bashing Thor fans for liking Thor as he was, and pandering to a bunch of bigots. It is not like it brings in sales.

Likewise, it undermines the point of all this “diversity.” Instead of creating a female character who can stand on her own merit with her own identity, it co-ops a male character’s identity. From that point on, everyone looks at the character as the replacement, not the “real one.” Perhaps this character will get her own spin-off and become her own person. If so, this is a poor way to do it.

Worse, this move plays into the negative stereotypes people have about feminists. Many people think feminism is about taking away men’s power, masculinity, and identity and giving those to women. And what does Aaron do to disprove this? He takes away Thor’s power, masculinity, identity, and his very name and gives it to a woman who promptly wields them to humiliate Thor and show he was never worthy of any of them to begin with.

Thanks, Aaron, for proving the critics of feminism right.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Jason Aaron: God of Blunders

  1. So a man’s very name and identity (albeit fictional) is just part of his “privilege” and he should give them up on request or demand? Unbelievable.

  2. Stupidity. Changes made to satisfy a demographic that, in the long term, isn’t going to buy your product anyway.

  3. Isn’t Titania the Absorbing Man’s girlfriend? I know they are villains, but Titania just backstabs and clobbers him out-of-blue in the last panel. I guess nothing punctuates overt feminist-chest thumping like a little female-on-male domestic violence.

  4. Excellent writing TS. I wish there were comics focused websites that had your level of intellectual honesty. Comics really could do with some version of gamergate. Instead it seems long-time fans
    are getting tired of being treated like crap while being expected to pay for the “privilege”. And the newer more “enlightened” fans it attracts are very, very few.

  5. This is the progressive equivalent of a Chick Tract. All the enemies are so overtly over the top and regurgitating lines that a typical feminist apparently thinks antifeminists say.

  6. “The industry needs more readers. That does not mean feminist-leaning, man-hating, race-baiting, “social justice warriors.” That means younger readers. Younger readers, like my godson and his friends, take one look at Aaron’s antics and go back to their better written, better paced, far more interesting, and already diverse manga and anime.”

    First off excellent piece.

    I’m not so young now but this was definitely my attitude to comic books in the early 2000s and its really struck me, apart for the few hyper violent comics(mostly image from memory) none really interested me long term and the entire thing confused me. Why the hell is Batman in everything? Is there anything apart from super hero genre comics around here? Why are so many pages in here ads? The cover is great but everything inside is poor. I was probably being very unfair but nothing from the DC or Marvel captivated me like Naruto, Vagabond or Berserk. I think the biggest difference is Manga lives and dies by its creator, there is never going to be a ‘run’ of One Piece written or illustrated by any other than Oda Eiichiro(and his assistants), if Oda dies there is no One Piece. On the other hand for western fans beloved characters can be turned into hack fodder by writers like Jason Aaron when ever Marvel feels like making a new book and it will be canon unless clumsily retconed out.

    As a result of the creator driven over the mantle/IP driven comic model lot of different stories are told. Manga is about people who gamble too much, like climbing mountains, playing go, being prostitutes, starting rock bands, being cocaine addicted shut ins, becoming literal gods, playing death sports, gardening, ninjas, racing, agriculture and yes being super heroes. Women in Japan do not complain about under-representation in manga because they are too busy writings stories for their own market, walk into a book store and they are easily 50% of the customers at anytime, often reading stuff written by people like themselves that would make feminists lose their collective shit.

    The big two know their customers are a niche but instead of expanding their medium by taking a chance on young diverse writers with different series and stories, fostering a culture of semi-professional graphic story tellers they can draw upon to create new markets they’ve increased the price of their books to accommodate higher print standards and artist/staff fees to continue to entice their long time customers. They’ve fallen into an almost vicious vampiric business model, subsisting on a base it loathes and blames for its niche status while successfully flogging off its developed IP for consumption in more mainstream mediums(film & games).

    Women write their own books well enough and they dominate print, albeit in a lot of pulp(the money is real enough at the end of the day). You would think they’d just let female talent write their own IPs or give some existing ones a spin instead of having some ‘gross nerd men’ as feminists say try to pander to them.

  7. Pingback: Top Posts of 2015 | Toy Soldiers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s