Woman claims 13-year old victim made her “think I was used”

Originally posted on August 3, 2015

I must admit I am impressed when sex offenders surprise me with their excuses. After a decade of dealing with these stories, I figure I have seen it all. However, every now and again someone manages to say or do something I would never expect. Case in point:

Nicole Porter faces statutory rape charges after getting a 13-year-old boy drunk and raping him. According to the victim, Porter and her roommate forced him to drink alcohol and threatened to hurt him if he refused:

Once he was drunk, the boy told investigators that Porter took him to her room where she took off her clothes. She then choked and pinned the boy down on the bed and forced him to have sex with her, court documents state.

Porter denied raping the boy and claimed her roommate provided the alcohol. Even if that were true, unfortunately for Porter her own journal makes the situation look worse:

Following her interview with deputies, her roommates went to the sheriff’s department the next day and gave officials a notebook that belonged to Porter. Officers obtained a search warrant and discovered incriminating writings that indicated she had indeed had sex with the boy while he was drunk, according to court records.

“…He made me feel very happy, I felt like I was loved for once, but I don’t think it was love. I think I was used,” she wrote, according to a probable cause statement.

That is the first time I have ever seen an accused rapist complain that their victim did not love them enough. That is Porter’s complaint. The boy made her feel happy, but apparently his heart was not into it. As a result, Porter felt used. Perhaps not in the way a 13-year-old who is forced to get drunk and is raped a grown woman would feel, but certainly “used.”

Of course, Porter’s horrific experience of a lackluster rape victim does not stop there:

“We kissed, hugged, held hands. For sake (sic) we have sex. I’m happy but not happy about it. I’m wearing my shirt he put on, and it smells like him.”

How sad for Porter. One can only imagine the pungent pubescent smell this boy left on her shirt. Why this boy on Porter’s shirt is anyone’s guess. It is not as if the average 13-year-old boy loves putting on women’s clothing.

Setting the sarcasm aside, people should consider the mind a person must have write what Porter felt compelled to commit to paper. Porter’s argument is essentially that the boy was a terrible lay. Think about the thought process behind that logic. This is not a person who seems remorseful for that they did. This seems like a person who does not think they did anything wrong, but who is smart enough to know others might not agree and lies when asked about the act she freely wrote about.

That leads us back to the charges. Prosecutors charged Porter with statutory rape. That is a rather curious charge considering that the victim claims he was drunk and forced to have sex. That should be rape, however, Missouri, the state this occurred in, has a peculiar set of rape laws. According to Missouri law, males cannot be raped:

566.030 – Rape in the first degree: Sexual intercourse (penetration of a vagina by a penis, even if slight or without emission) with a person who’s incapacitated, incapable of consent, or by force (includes date rape drugs)

Some readers may recall the Shawn Hornbeck case from several years ago. The rapist, Michael Devlin, plead guilty to dozens of sodomy, not rape, charges. That is because at the time, he legally did not rape Hornbeck. When Devlin kidnapped and sexually brutalized then 11-year-old Hornbeck, Devlin committed, “‘deviate sexual intercourse’ (oral or anal sex or penetration or the victim’s vagina or anus by a finger or object) with a person who’s incapacitated, incapable of consent, or by force (includes date rape drugs).”

This explains why Porter was not charged with rape. It also partly explains why she was not charged with sodomy. Both sodomy and statutory rape carry a maximum five-year sentence unless there is an aggravated sexual offense or the victim is under 12-years-old, in which case the maximum becomes ten years.

There is one difference: sodomy is a Class B felony, whereas statutory rape is a Class C felony. In short, statutory rape is the lowest offense the state could charge Porter with given the evidence and the victim’s accusation. That speaks volumes about the state’s lack of concern for a boy who was choked and pinned down by a grown woman.

Missouri did update its rape statute. Starting in January 2017, the rape statute will read:

A person commits the offense of rape in the first degree if he or she has sexual intercourse with another person who is incapacitated, incapable of consent, or lacks the capacity to consent, or by the use of forcible compulsion. Forcible compulsion includes the use of a substance administered without a victim’s knowledge or consent which renders the victim physically or mentally impaired so as to be incapable of making an informed consent to sexual intercourse.

There is a catch:

“Sexual intercourse”, any penetration, however slight, of the female genitalia by the penis.

I suppose I could give Missouri an A for effort, but since the state is so found of Class C felonies I think they deserve a C themselves.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Woman claims 13-year old victim made her “think I was used”

  1. In the old days, males pushed for sex but females held back, fearing pregnancy and the poverty and shame of unwed motherhood. Today it’s the reverse. Females have no fear and no shame, while decent men are terrified of sex; one pregnancy or rape accusation could ruin his life. So women who crave dick have to get it from unemployable thugs or naive underage boys.

  2. Dave-

    I don’t know that there is any evidence that female-perpetrated rape is more common now than it was in the past. It’s just that in 2015, this is outrageous and archaic. Most people would agree that men and women should be treated equally and there is simply no excuse for a blatantly sexist legal double standard.

    If female-perpetrated offences are becoming more common, I would imagine that has more to do with women being more likely to occupy a position of authority over a man (women have always been authority figures for boys*) more than anything else. Which would mean more opportunity to abuse that authority.

    * I was going to say something about “female teacher” and google that term. Wow. We really are living in a sickness.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s