Lawyer argues “shame” is enough punishment

A lawyer offered a new rebuttal for a client convicted of sexual abuse of a child: shame is the worst punishment. I give the lawyer credit. Despite the argument’s absurdity, it is inventive. The lawyer explained her logic:

[Raheelah] Dar’s barrister requested her client receive a community sentence for the conviction over a jail sentence.

Alison Pryor told Teeside Crown Court: “Because of the context under which this offending took place, my client is a practicing Muslim, the shame that this has brought and will bring on her family cannot be underestimated. It is something that would not be found in a more ordinary case of this type.

“The effect that a sentence would have is less than the effect that the conviction had on the community.”

Again, this is an inventive argument. Dar will suffer religious shame therefore she should not spend any time in jail. That seems fair. The victim only accused Dar of isolating and manipulating the her for four years as Dar abused her. The victim now reports difficulty interacting with people, disliking being touched, and a number of health problems related to her attempt to cope with the abuse. It would obviously serve both the victim and the community if Dar sat at home and received therapy for her bi polar condition rather than the seven years in jail as per her sentence. There would, of course, be no risk of Dar offending against other children.

Fortunately, and quite surprisingly considering this happened in the UK and involved a female and Muslim offender, the judge did not buy this argument:

A judge has rejected the claim of a lawyer defending a woman who was convicted of a string of sexual offences against a nine-year-old girl that she should not face jail time because the “shame” brought on herself and her family is punishment enough. […] Recorder Tim Roberts QC said he would be failing in his duties if he did not pass a jail sentence.

He told Ms Dar: “You were 26. She was only nine. You were sexually experienced and had been married. She was an innocent. You were crafty.”

It is good that judges are beginning to see that female predators behave the same as male predators. Far too often female predators receive sympathy from the court and face little consequence for their actions. Often they only receive probation, are not required to appear on a sex offender registry, continue to have access to children, including custody of their own children, and receive sympathy for whatever abuse they suffered as a child.

This woman used the girl’s trust to control her and now attempts to hide behind her religion as an reason for why she should not be punished. The proper response to this defense is to place the woman in jail. She will not serve the full term. Good behavior and her status as a woman will ensure that at best Dar will serve half the sentence. However, she does need a real consequence for her actions. She should not receive a pass after abusing a child for four years.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Lawyer argues “shame” is enough punishment

  1. Pingback: Lawyer argues “shame” is enough punishment – Manosphere.org

  2. Of course its no surprise that the “they’ve suffered enough shame. there is no need for jail” defense is only brought up for women.

    Can you imagine someone saying that Jared Fogle (of Subway fame)’s defense had tried to argue he shouldn’t go to jail because his public shame would suffice? Or Brock Turner?

  3. “She will not serve the full term. Good behavior and her status as a woman will ensure that at best Dar will serve half the sentence. However, she does need a real consequence for her actions. She should not receive a pass after abusing a child for four years.”

    Says a lot about what an uphill battle we have if this is a victory. I mean, it’s like “I lost only half my squad of 6 veterans during that mission, sounds like a very good mission”. Yeah, if you’re playing XCOM Long War it is actually great. Then again, XCOM Long War is hardcore.

    I hope I didn’t confuse people with my gamer metaphor.

  4. The idea for this defence probably comes from the fact that Muslims, as far as I know, tend to take ideas of pride and shame far more seriously than westerners. Self criticism is non-existent in their culture, and to bring shame upon one’s tribe, one’s culture, one’s family is a very serious matter to them. Obviously that’s not good enough, but the fact that the offender is a Muslim probably is relevant to this choice of defence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s