Joe Rogan recently interviewed Neil Degrasse Tyson. I enjoy listening to Tyson speak. It is rare to hear someone that enthusiastic about science. He also comes across as a likeable man, which makes him even more engaging.
One of my favorite things about Tyson is when he offers up tidbits of science that people are familiar with and proceeds to show how much deeper the knowledge goes. He does this with multiple types of infinity. I had heard of this before, although I cannot recall where. Yet his explanation is simply inthralling.
I also hope he takes Rogan’s advice and goes back to commenting on films. I find it fascinating to hear what catches his attention as glaringly wrong.
It is a fun interview, and of the rare instances where science is explained in a simplified way to make it palatable. Continue reading →
One lesson very controversial people must learn is that they will eventually say something they ought not say. This is not a matter telling them to silence their free expression. Rather, it is a basic truth. It is not because what they say will be wrong, but that it can easily be used against them.
Milo Yiannopoulos is a self-professed provocateur. He says things he does not necessarily believe because of the reaction it will get. He also happens to say things he does believe that prompt the same outrage. Unless you follow his comments and understand his mannerisms, it is easy to confuse one of his jokes for his actual opinion. He also tends to mire his genuine opinion in with outrageous commentary, making even more difficult to parse his intention.
I think this is what happened with his comments about cross-generational sex. The Reagan Battalion released an edited version of a Drunken Peasants podcast Milo was on in 2016. In the podcast, Milo makes several statements regarding adult men having sexual encounters with teen boys. I think it is important to hear the exchange in context to understand precisely what Milo said. Here is the beginning of the exchange: Continue reading →
Jordan Peterson is a clinical psychologist and tenured professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. He is currently embroiled in a battle with his university and the progressives over the use of “preferred prounouns”.
That term refers to some transgender people wanting to use something other than “he” or “she”. Some of them are content with using “they”, which is grammatically incorrect but at least a real word. Others prefer an ever increasing list of new words, each more absurd than the previous. Not only do they wish to use these new pronouns, they also expect everyone else to use them. Anyone refusing to do so is violating the person’s identity.
Of course, since this is happening in Canada it comes with an additional penalty: refusing to use a person’s preferred pronoun is a crime punishable by fine. Should one refuse to pay the fine, one risks jail time.
That is right. It is possible to go to jail for calling someone “he” when they prefer “zir”. Continue reading →