Crossing the line

ESPN ran a story on Mike McQueary recently. The article The Whistleblower’s Last Stand covers McQueary’s present circumstances following the fallout of the Jerry Sandusky trial and losing his job at Penn State. The article gives an account of when McQueary informed his players that he would not coach them in the next game. What makes the story questionable is this portion:

Behind closed doors, he singled out each player by name. “You are a good kid, this is why you are here, you belong here,” he said. “I’m not sure what is going to happen to Joe. I’m not sure what is going to happen to me.” Then, as he told them what he had seen and heard in that locker room shower a decade ago, Big Red began to cry.

The players listened in silence, their heads down. “He said he had some regret that he didn’t stop it,” says Patrick Flanagan, then a redshirt freshman receiver. “We didn’t want to see someone we looked up to get emotional. It was heartbreaking for all of us. We weren’t sure who to believe. You see an older man crying, someone you looked up to. It’s sad.”

Finally, McQueary confided in his players something he hoped would make them understand how he’d reacted at the time. He told them he could relate to the fear and helplessness felt by the boy in the shower because he too was sexually abused as a boy.

The article does not focus on that revelation. The only other mention of it is this: Continue reading

A Tale of Two Tales

Mike McQueary caught a lot of heat last week for his behavior. According to a grand jury report, McQueary claims he saw Jerry Sandusky anally raping a 10-year-old boy. He stated that the boy and Sandusky saw him, and then he ran out distraught.

However, recently release emails paints a different picture. In the emails McQueary states, “I did stop it, not physically … but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room.” He also stated, “I did have discussions with police and with the official at the university in charge of police…. no one can imagine my thoughts or wants to be in my shoes for those 30-45 seconds … trust me.”

These emails have not helped McQueary. It is unclear what he means by making sure the alleged rape stopped before he left, and that statement conflicts with his testimony about leaving immediately. It also does not help that he still implies that he left the boy there with Sandusky, and continued to associate with Sandusky in the weeks and months following the alleged incident.

The bigger problem, however, is that the police found no record of any discussion between them and McQueary:  Continue reading