Iraqi refugee rapes boys, claims “sexual emergency”

In one of the most horrific cases of rape I have heard of, an Iraqi man raped a 10-year-old boy at a pool because the man was sexually frustrated:

Police investigators have ascertained that the 20 year old man entered Austria on the 13th September, travelling into the country via the Balkans.

On the December 2nd he brutally attacked the young boy, pulling him into a changing cubicle, pulling down his swimming trunks and assaulting him. Although the boy cried out he was not heard by anyone, Kronen Zeitung has reported.

Following the attack, the Iraqi amused himself by diving repeatedly from the three metre board. The young boy, meanwhile, went to a lifeguard in tears and told him what had happened. The police were immediately called and were able to arrest the Iraqi on the spot, while the boy was taken to hospital suffering from serious injuries.

I read about this story several days ago, but it has taken me some time to process it. When a person rapes someone, they usually do not remain at the scene. They certainly do not set about repeatedly diving into a pool. To assault this boy and then remain at the scene as if nothing happened is baffling. This is particularly odd given that the man admitted that sex with boys is “forbidden in any country in the world.”

Why rape the boy? If you know it is forbidden, why do it?

Yet he did it, and for a bizarre reason:

During his interrogation the man attempted to excuse himself, saying that it had been a “sexual emergency.”

He explained that he had to satisfy himself with the lad as he had not had sex in four months, explaining “I couldn’t stand not having sex as I have excess sexual energy.” He added that it had been “a huge mistake” and that he had known it would “scar the boy”.

Most people have a simple solution for releasing such pinned up sexual energy. It is called masturbation. There is no need to rape someone if you want to orgasm. Yet not only does the man commit rape, but he appears to have simply grabbed the nearest person. There is no reason to what he did at all. He does not appear to have a preference for boys. It is as if he got the thought in his head “I need to come” and snatched the first person he saw (and perhaps the one who looked like they could not fight back). Once he had his orgasm, he went about his business as if nothing happened.

It is absolutely disgusting, which is apparently why the Austrian police made every effort to inform the public about this man. Actually, that is incorrect. They attempted to cover it up:

Austrian police did not initially release details of the rape, which took place on 22 December at the Theresienbad pool, in order to protect the victim, according to Kronen Zeitung.

When rumours later emerged on Facebook, police said they must be sensitive about cases involving refugees, who they said had “been through a lot” – but stressed there would be zero tolerance for such acts.

It is hard to argue you have zero tolerance for child rape when your first inclination was to hide this from the public. It is reasonable to try to prevent hatred against refugees based on a single act, yet when you have someone who snatched a child from a pool to rape him just because, this is something you need to talk about because it is possible this man has done it before. You do not cover it up for the sake political correctness.

It appears Austrian police are also not the only ones covering this up. Outside of a handful of examples, most liberal and progressive media outlets have avoided this story and several stories related migrants and refugees assaulting people in Europe. It is astounding to watch our society dance around horrendous crimes for the sake of not appearing racist by noting that the majority of the people committing these acts come from certain parts of the world. We ought to be better than this.

19 thoughts on “Iraqi refugee rapes boys, claims “sexual emergency”

  1. There is no need to rape someone if you want to orgasm. Yet not only does the man commit rape, but he appears to have simply grabbed the nearest person. There is no reason to what he did at all. He does not appear to have a preference for boys. It is as if he got the thought in his head “I need to come” and snatched the first person he saw (and perhaps the one who looked like they could not fight back). Once he had his orgasm, he went about his business as if nothing happened.

    This is the most terrifying type of predator of all; the one who knows what they did is wrong…acknowledges that it is not only illegal but immoral…and admits to authority figures that their willful actions caused pain and suffering to their victim…

    But their temporary sexual satisfaction was infinitely more important to them.
    So they did it anyway, even when the negatives of their actions outweigh the single, amazingly selfish, positive a million to one.

    I think you are right, TS. This scum had no preference in mind when he committed rape. The victim could’ve been a little girl, an adolescent of either sex, a woman, or even a weaker looking man. This piece of dirt saw the boy as a means to an end, just as he would’ve seen anyone else that he thought he could overpower. A truly vile human being.

    I hope the boy was told that nothing was his fault, that he was good and brave for telling the lifeguard, and will be given all the help he needs to successfully get through this.

  2. In Islam, there are passages about the promised virgins that will await the muslim men in their paradise when they die, but there are also promised many boys that they “will pass among them,” and that will be like “scattered pearls” among them. These boys are for sexual pleasure just like the virginal women are for. It’s part of their culture to have sexual destruction and violence against the most vulnerable in society (women and children – especially boys). They have no fear of consequences or “god” and no respect for life – that is Islam.

  3. They have no fear of consequences or “god” and no respect for life – that is Islam.

    I think a fair amount of the destruction and rape we see in this refugee situation is based very heavily on the culture and religious extremism they are bringing with them. As I pointed out over at Spawny’s blog, I live only a few blocks away from a mosque, and a lot of families in my neighborhood are of Middle Eastern descent. The majority of them are Muslims, and they are likewise horrified and disgusted by what is happening in Europe. I think that is the difference between cultural-religious zealots and regular people who are like you and me.

  4. I don’t know Tarn, a lot of abuse and very crazy ideology is kept hidden, but still very prominent in normal seeming muslim families. I’ve seen quite a few come out now and say that they were living a lie, and that Islam (even not the “extreme” version in a sharia law country) is a religion of evil. One friend I’m close to, her and her husband took in some nieces and nephews from a sister that married into Islam. The abuse and psychological abuse they’ve endured from that religion is just insane to imagine. It shocked them how brainwashed the kids already were – and how violent they all were to each other, and how violent the parents had been to them when they disobeyed. They do things that are hidden because they don’t want to get caught. The immigrants just haven’t learned yet that they have to rape in secret, like in Rotherham.

  5. That’s fair, Dragonfly. I also know some ex-Muslims who speak of religiously “approved” abuse, but then I also know Christians who have told me similar stories.

    I just think it can be said about most extreme religious sects. Look at all the abuse that comes out regarding the Mormon faith, or the ultra orthodox Jews, or even the molestation in the Catholic church that was allowed to continue for decades in some cases. Heck, even my faith isn’t in the clear…every year I read about Pagans who’ve attempted to use “crystals” to heal their child’s illness or fake priests/priestesses who try to use covens to recruit for sex. I’ll agree that some religions + cultures are much worse combinations than others though, such as the case discussed here. Not arguing that point whatsoever!

  6. Most of the muslim men in the rape gangs were considered very devout, normal muslims… but they were nailing girls’ tongues to tables while they raped them. And it happened on such a magnitude – and as it came out, Rotherham was just one place where it was occuring, it had been occurring in multiple other places all over Europe. And the gangs were mostly run by only men of Islamic faith. Other faiths just don’t get together like that and decide that they’re all going to rape a 12 year old that night. It just doesn’t compare to that in any way imaginable (on that scale of magnitude). I don’t know if you’ve read the reports of what they actually did to these girls, but it wasn’t just rape, it was more like sexual destruction… and these were normal, even “kind” Muslims in their everyday life.

  7. Yeah, they are absolute monsters. It is terrifying how much people are able to put up a good front in public then become demons at home/in private.

  8. “this is something you need to talk about because it is possible this man has done it before.”

    It is certain he has done this before. And it is certain he will do it again.

    There are reports all the time of the people in the refugee camps being afraid for their young boys or girls, becasue they are REPEATEDLY raped. Not just once. They are gang raped. And then gang raped again. The refugees repeatedly rape the children that came with them. There are multiple reports of police having gone in to rescue a boy or girl that was being REPEATEDLY raped, and failing because the filth muslim men would gang up on the police and not allow the children that they use for rape (or sexual emergencies) to leave.

    Honestly, they should never have let these “refugees” into European countries.

  9. The explanation is maddeningly simple.
    The Iraqi was himself raped as a boy, certainly at least twice, and there was no language to express it and no authority to appeal to.

  10. Saracen III, I think you are right. Arab/Islamic poetry speaks of having sex with boys as even better than with their “whores” who have to remain veiled.

    Abu Nuwas:
    ‘O the joy of sodomy!
    So now be sodomites you Arabs…
    Turn not away from it-therein is wondrous pleasure.
    Take some coy lad with kiss-curls twisting on his temple
    and ride him as he stands like some gazelle standing to her mate .
    A lad whom all can see girt with sword and belt not like your whore who has to go veiled…..
    Make for smooth faced boys
    and do your very best to mount them,
    for women are the mounts of devils!

  11. First the cologne attacks and now this. Absolutely horrifying. And the sheer blatant nature of it makes it worse. I mean, it’s exactly what the progressive crowd have talked about regarding ‘rape culture’. The sense of entitlement, the assumption that one can DO this, it’s all there. But unfortunately common in the Islamic world. Granted, it doesn’t necessarily reflect most Muslims (certainly not the ones I’ve known), but the culture does germinate such attitudes. I previously mentioned how in Afghanistan for example that the first Flashman book remarks on an Afghan cultural more that encourages a sexual interest in young boys, and a friend of mine from the British Army’s Parachute Regiment told me that it’s a reality, and they’re quite blatant about it (the kite runner touched on it as well). A bit like the Catholic Church historically I suppose.

    We in the west need to show that we regard Muslims as being better than this by cracking down HARD on this sort of activity and showing them that we don’t expect it of them. This disgusting excuse for a human being needs to have the book thrown at him, I would say that the fact that he abandoned his wife and daughter in Iraq, but if he’s a rapist then they’re probably better off without him. As for this kid, I just want to give him a hug and tell him that he’s not to blame and that everything is going to be OK.

    On a small diversion, Hello Tarn, nice to hear from you since our last conversation 🙂

  12. Saracen III:

    The explanation is maddeningly simple.
    The Iraqi was himself raped as a boy, certainly at least twice, and there was no language to express it and no authority to appeal to.

    That is possible, however, the man’s response suggests that he at least knew it would be unacceptable, which would imply that in his home country the public response is that the act is wrong.

  13. Pingback: Wednesday Link Encyclopedia | Clarissa's Blog

  14. Pingback: Lightning Round – 2016/02/17 | Free Northerner

  15. Pingback: What happens when you play loose with the definition of rape | Toy Soldiers

  16. Pingback: Austrian court issues same sentence in Iraqi rape case retrial | Toy Soldiers

Leave a comment